Further Resources
Why Your Emotional Intelligence Training is Probably Making Your Managers Worse
Related Articles:
The bloke sitting across from me in the Surry Hills café looked genuinely confused when I told him his £12,000 emotional intelligence program had actually damaged his team's performance. Fair dinkum, I understood his reaction - after all, he'd just spent six months rolling out what the consultants called "cutting-edge EQ development" across his 200-person organisation.
But here's the uncomfortable truth that nobody in the emotional intelligence industry wants to admit: most EQ training for managers is complete rubbish. And I should know - I've been cleaning up the mess from badly designed emotional intelligence programs for the past 16 years.
The problem isn't emotional intelligence itself. The problem is how we're teaching it.
The Fake Empathy Epidemic
Walk into any corporate training room in Melbourne or Sydney these days and you'll witness something truly disturbing: middle managers practicing "active listening faces" like they're auditioning for a soap opera. They nod at precisely timed intervals, mirror body language with the subtlety of a mime artist, and deploy phrases like "I hear that you're feeling..." with all the authenticity of a politician's promise.
This is what happens when we reduce emotional intelligence to a checklist of behaviours rather than genuine human connection. We're creating armies of managers who sound emotionally intelligent but feel about as authentic as a three-dollar note.
I watched this play out spectacularly at a major Australian bank (I won't name them, but let's just say their recent advertising focuses heavily on customer care). After their expensive EQ program, employee satisfaction actually dropped 23%. Turns out, people can smell fake empathy from across the office floor.
The real kicker? The bank's executives were baffled. "But everyone's using the right language now," the HR director protested. Exactly. They'd taught their managers to perform emotional intelligence rather than develop it.
Why Most EQ Training Misses the Mark
Here's where I'll probably ruffle some feathers: the majority of emotional intelligence training programs are designed by people who've never managed a team through a proper crisis. They're built on academic models that look brilliant on PowerPoint but crumble the moment Sharon from accounting has a meltdown about the new expense system.
The traditional approach treats emotional intelligence like it's a technical skill you can master through memorisation. "If employee displays anger, apply technique B." It's about as useful as a chocolate teapot.
Real emotional intelligence isn't about following scripts. It's about developing genuine self-awareness, understanding your triggers, and learning to navigate complex human dynamics without losing your marbles. But that's messy, unpredictable work that doesn't fit neatly into a two-day workshop format.
Most programs also make the fatal error of focusing exclusively on managing others' emotions while completely ignoring the manager's own emotional state. I've seen countless leaders who can expertly coach their team through stress while simultaneously burning themselves out because they never learned to manage their own emotional well-being.
The Cultural Cringe Factor
Another massive oversight in most EQ training is the complete ignorance of Australian workplace culture. We import programs designed for American corporate environments and wonder why they fall flat Down Under.
Australians have a fairly unique relationship with emotional expression in the workplace. We value straight-talking and authenticity, but we're also suspicious of anything that feels too touchy-feely. When you force naturally direct communicators to adopt Californian-style emotional language, it comes across as disingenuous.
I remember working with a mining company in Perth where the EQ consultant kept encouraging the supervisors to "validate feelings" and "create safe spaces." These were blokes who'd spent 20 years managing crews in the Pilbara - they needed practical tools for dealing with stress, fatigue, and pressure, not corporate therapy speak.
The program was a disaster. Not because the supervisors lacked emotional intelligence (quite the opposite - most had developed exceptional people skills through years of real-world experience), but because the training completely misunderstood their context and communication style.
What Actually Works: The Underground Approach
Here's what I've learned works after years of fixing broken EQ programs: stop trying to teach emotional intelligence and start developing emotional competence.
The difference? Competence is about capability in real situations, not theoretical knowledge. It's the difference between knowing the road rules and actually being able to drive in peak-hour traffic on the Pacific Highway.
The best managers I've worked with didn't develop their emotional intelligence in a training room. They developed it through experience, reflection, and honest feedback. They learned to read team dynamics during budget cuts, navigate personality conflicts during high-pressure projects, and maintain their composure when everything was going sideways.
Effective EQ development needs to be embedded in real work situations. Instead of role-playing generic scenarios, managers need to practice with their actual team challenges. Instead of learning abstract emotional theories, they need tools that work when deadlines are looming and stakeholders are breathing down their necks.
The Accountability Problem
One thing that drives me absolutely mental about most emotional intelligence training is the complete lack of follow-up and accountability. Organisations spend thousands on a program, everyone gets their certificates, and then... nothing. No ongoing development, no measurement of actual behaviour change, no support when managers hit real-world challenges.
It's like teaching someone to swim in a classroom and then throwing them in the ocean. The 67% of managers who report that their EQ training had no lasting impact aren't failing - the system is failing them.
Real EQ Development: The Practical Path
If you're serious about developing emotional intelligence in your managers (and I mean actually serious, not just ticking compliance boxes), here's what needs to happen:
Start with self-awareness work that goes beyond personality assessments. Managers need to understand their stress responses, their communication patterns under pressure, and their default reactions to conflict. This isn't about becoming a different person - it's about becoming conscious of who you already are.
Focus on practical skills that translate directly to management challenges. How do you have a difficult conversation with an underperforming team member? How do you maintain team morale during redundancies? How do you manage your own emotional state when senior leadership is applying pressure?
Build ongoing practice opportunities into regular work. Monthly team retrospectives, peer coaching sessions, and structured feedback processes do more for emotional intelligence development than any workshop ever will.
And please, for the love of all that's holy, stop measuring success through course evaluations and start measuring it through actual behaviour change and team performance metrics.
The Bottom Line
Emotional intelligence matters enormously for management effectiveness. But the way we're currently training it is largely ineffective and sometimes counterproductive. We're creating managers who can talk the talk but can't handle the real emotional complexity of modern leadership.
The solution isn't to abandon EQ development - it's to approach it with the same rigour and practical focus we apply to other critical management skills. That means less theory, more practice, less performance, more authenticity.
Because at the end of the day, your team doesn't need a manager who can recite emotional intelligence principles. They need someone who can stay calm under pressure, navigate difficult conversations with skill and compassion, and create an environment where everyone can do their best work.
That's the kind of emotional intelligence that actually matters. Everything else is just expensive theatre.
Our Favourite Blogs: